Lyin’ photos & believing what you think you see.

We exist in a tsunami of photos—from Facebook to Pinterest to Instagram to our own collections on phones and online.

Some photos, although legit, seem to lie. They do not represent a typical human point of view. How can that be? They may:

  • Distort
  • Eliminate or exaggerate important visual cues. Or
  • Capture a moment that the human eye cannot perceive.

Sports photos illustrate this.

Winona_State_baseball_pitcher_Mike_Wasilik_2014
Winona State baseball pitcher. By Eric Enfermero (Own work). {CC BY-SA 3.0] 

If we were to paint a portrait of these pitchers using these photo as a reference, it would be confusing due to their contorted body positions. They do not make sense except when depicting a baseball pitcher. And then, we accept it.

54caae5fca7e1_-_fastball_0910-md-GregoryCammett:Getty images
Popular Mechanics. The physics of a 105 mph fastball. Gregory Cammett/Diamond Images/Getty Images

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here’s another example.

This pelican has swooped onto the beach to claim a fish. One of the wings looks weirdly like a stick without any feathers. We accept this in a photo because we are conditioned to understanding that photos present images that differ from how we see. If this were a painting, it would be confusing.

PelicanEatFish FL  lying photos.jpeg
Birds on a beach in Florida. Photo by Jane M. Mason.

There was a famous experiment on proving what is actually happening as opposed to what we think we are seeing. To win a bet, Eadweard Muybridge was able to prove that when horses are galloping, there is a moment on each stride when all four feet are in the air for a fraction of a moment. This bet and subsequent experiment was an important step in the development of film and continuous motion photography.

dsc01102
Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago. Photo by Jane M. Mason

Or this photo, that is dramatic, but hard to decipher unless you recognize the scene. It looks up into a stairway at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago.

It illustrates how an unusual point of view disguises normal cues to interpret an image.  The unique curved stairway, from a ground-level point of view, has be abstracted to a geometric  level.

 

 

How do we accept images in photography that we reject in paintings or “real life”?

Each medium, (photography, video, film, sketching, painting, viewing a printed photo or painting in a book, and seeing first-hand through our own eyes), presents a different culmination of attributes defining the depiction of the scene.

shadow cropped.jpg
What is this? Although it almost looks like a hide of some sort. It is a concrete sidewalk with bright dappled summer light. The swirls were pushed into the concrete to minimize slipping. This scene is extraordinarily common. A photograph magnifies the texture and and contrast, and separates it from its context. This allows us to think about these attributes in a new light.   Photo by jane M. Mason, Cleveland Botanical Garden, Cleveland, OH. 

Each medium has biases of color and depth of field. Or biases of strengths such as the a moment captured in a frame –as in a photo—or viewed as a continuous image—as in a film or video. Or being there in person presents the ability to move our point of view to gather more information. There are colors that we see that cannot be recreated through a TV set or monitor. The printing process for a book cannot create the complete range of colors from an original painting. Photography cannot capture certain hues or the ranges of shadow or darkness.

IMG_5135.JPG
If we truly look at this photo , we could conclude that this adorable puppy has an enormous head. We are familiar though with this point of view, and we know that the distortion created here is due to the face being close to the camera. This distortion can create adorable whimsical effects. On the other hand, it is challenging to create a painting with this much foreshortening because, unless it is supposed to look a bit silly, it can look weird. Photo, Todd Kleismit, Cleveland OH, 2017. 

And, each creator of an image has her own bias or visual preferences  that flavor the final image.

Silverware in Chicago.jpeg
This is a tabletop at a cafe in Chicago. The brilliance of the reflected light was captivating. This would be fun to paint. Although the redness of the reflection might be considered an exaggeration. Photo, Jane M. Mason, 2014. 

Engage Your Critical Observation Skills

Critical observation allows us to intently observe and mentally process the subject of our focus. Yet our ability to register the details and to accurately remember them is imperfect.

We should accept with a grain of salt what is presented to us. Even a legitimate, unedited image or video, is the creation of the artist who composed it.

Why is this important and how do we use this information?

  1. As an artist, I’m careful about taking several photos of my subject from a variety of points of view. I’m not left with a strangely structured scene without enough information to resolve, for example, how the pelican’s wing looks. this may be advice for all of us. Don’t let one photo be the entire story.
  1. As consumers of media, (as we all are), we need to be critical about the images viewed or clicked on. Even unadulterated images can present a skewed depiction on reality.
  1. As a consumer of culture, remember that each medium presents its own biases. It is valuable to study art in books, videos, and online. Yet it is also more important to see the original art, as the artist created it, in a museum, historic house or collection in a gallery or home. Or better yet, invest in original art, and hang it in a space you can see it and enjoy it.
  1. An educated citizen of the 21st C, consider that there are many harmless and unintentional biases that underlie every piece of content we consume. In addition to intention bias in propaganda. We need to be mindful, attentive, open-minded consumers.

And remember that photos DO lie.

 

Advertisements

About artinthecenter

I am a lifelong artist having studied painting, photography, drawing, and other media, in schools in the US and Italy. I won my first art contest when I was five--at a museum-- and my point of view tends to be as a five-year-old creative child embracing life. Creativity is a core response for me. How can we bring the infinite knowledge and excitement held by our museums and academics into the heart and minds of everyone? There is so much to share. Let’s ask questions, and discuss. Follow me on twitter @janemmason. Check out all sort of artsy information at: www.watchingpaintdry.com +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This policy is valid from 1 January 2016 This is a personal, educational, blog written and edited by me, Jane M. Mason. For questions about this blog, please contact: jane@watchingpaintdry.com. Sincere effort has been exerted to cite, recognize, and thank all sources of content, including images, quotations or concepts that are not those of Watching Paint Dry LLC (WPDLLC), including Jane M. Mason. If you feel we have included something in this blog that has not been accurately noted or recognized to be from a source other than the intellectual property of WPDLLC, please let me know and I will adjust the citation when presented with specific citation sources and details. As an artist and writer, a core principal of mine is to respect and recognize intellectual content of others. If you are interested in using concepts, photos or other intellectual property from this blog, please contact, Rights Manager, Danielle Raub at Hello@watchingpaintdry.com. This blog does not contain any content that is likely to present a conflict of interest, although opposing points of view, as long as they are respectful, are welcome. This blog does not accept cash or paid topic insertions. However, we will consider accepting and keeping free products, services, travel, event tickets, and other forms of compensation from companies and organizations. The compensation received will not influence the content, topics or posts made in this blog. All advertising is in the form of advertisements generated by a third party ad network. Those advertisements will be identified as paid advertisements. The owner of this blog, WPDLLC, is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics within the content of this blog. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are those of Jane M. Mason or the associates of WPDLLC. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider. This policy has been adapted from DisclosurePolicy.org. For your own policy, go to http://www.disclosurepolicy.org

1 Response

  1. […] But for most of us, it is a struggle to overcome our natural inclination to draw from our memories and the “naming” function in our brains. We simplify what we are seeing. We ignore the details. We stubbornly override the necessity to draw what we are actually seeing.  (My blog post on Critical Observation discusses this skill.) […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s